Contact order and ab initio protein structure prediction

TitleContact order and ab initio protein structure prediction
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2002
AuthorsBonneau, R., Ruczinski I., Tsai J., & Baker D.
JournalProtein science
Volume11
Issue8
Pagination1937-44
Date Published2002 Aug
ISSN0961-8368
KeywordsAlgorithms, Cluster Analysis, Computer Simulation, Forecasting, Kinetics, Models, Chemical, Monte Carlo Method, Peptide Fragments, Primary Publication, Protein Folding, Protein Structure, Secondary, Proteins, Thermodynamics
Abstract

Although much of the motivation for experimental studies of protein folding is to obtain insights for improving protein structure prediction, there has been relatively little connection between experimental protein folding studies and computational structural prediction work in recent years. In the present study, we show that the relationship between protein folding rates and the contact order (CO) of the native structure has implications for ab initio protein structure prediction. Rosetta ab initio folding simulations produce a dearth of high CO structures and an excess of low CO structures, as expected if the computer simulations mimic to some extent the actual folding process. Consistent with this, the majority of failures in ab initio prediction in the CASP4 (critical assessment of structure prediction) experiment involved high CO structures likely to fold much more slowly than the lower CO structures for which reasonable predictions were made. This bias against high CO structures can be partially alleviated by performing large numbers of additional simulations, selecting out the higher CO structures, and eliminating the very low CO structures; this leads to a modest improvement in prediction quality. More significant improvements in predictions for proteins with complex topologies may be possible following significant increases in high-performance computing power, which will be required for thoroughly sampling high CO conformations (high CO proteins can take six orders of magnitude longer to fold than low CO proteins). Importantly for such a strategy, simulations performed for high CO structures converge much less strongly than those for low CO structures, and hence, lack of simulation convergence can indicate the need for improved sampling of high CO conformations. The parallels between Rosetta simulations and folding in vivo may extend to misfolding: The very low CO structures that accumulate in Rosetta simulations consist primarily of local up-down beta-sheets that may resemble precursors to amyloid formation.

Alternate JournalProtein Sci.
AttachmentSize
bonneau02A.pdf259.2 KB